political

Feature Image

TruthTalks: The Great Reset

Top Image

Happy New Year! In December, Dr Christopher Peppler wrote THIS post about the current situation in our nations and what it means globally as well as biblically. Think radical socialism for a start! Listen to him expand on this by clicking on the “play” button below. Big things are happening, but do not fear:

‘…God has a third and final Great Reset planned; it goes by several names but is most often referred to as ‘the great and awesome day of the Lord’ (Malachi 4:5).

Please like, comment, share and subscribe to the TruthTalks Podcast. Best, admin

TruthTalks: The Great Reset Read More »

Feature Image

The Great Reset

Top Image

The Great Reset is a Term That is Starting to be Used Frequently Around the World.

In Christian circles some excellent teachers are now addressing it; Martin Iles gives a good overview of it HERE.  The phrase was coined by the World Economic Forum and if you have any desire to wade through obfuscated politic-speak then you can read all about their ideas HERE

The Cambridge Dictionary definition of ‘reset’ gives a clue to what is meant by the term The Great Reset: ‘to turn a piece of computer equipment off and then on again when it does not work correctly, to make it start working correctly again.’

A Disclaimer

I am a theologian and neither an economist nor a political scientist. However, I have to start this article with a fair amount of both politics and economics to present what I believe to be important truths. Although this post is on the long side and a little complex, please don’t skip to the end because context is important.

The Political-Social Aspects of The Great Reset

The ideas and plans that fall under the ‘reset’ label are complex and convoluted, but although I risk oversimplification, here are the main components:

  • A reset of economic policies and structures.
  • A reset of money resources to create new systems.
  • A reset of health and social approaches to global challenges through the use of new technologies and global cooperation.

The aim of The Great Reset is Globalism and Socialism on a grand scale and the catalyst is COVID-19.

The Key Ideas Presented by Proponents of The Great Reset are:

  • Changed mindsets to such things as ‘Capitalism leads to inequality’ and ‘the idea that a free market will provide is a myth’. Rather, Socialism leads to equality and a central government will provide.
  • Creation of new metrics that measure what matters. For instance, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measures the wrong things because it is a measure of wealth that ignores its distribution, social benefit, environmental impact, and social health.
  • Design of new incentives leading to a new vision of all corporations and governments to promote an economy that serves all people.
  • Construction of genuine connections between people and nature.

A lot of this, while ambiguous, sounds pretty fair and reasonable, equal opportunity for the underprivileged, rulers who are rewarded for genuinely serving their constituents, all nations being accountable for combating the destructive consequences of global warming, and so on.   However,  it is when we consider many of the proposed means of bringing all this about that matters get problematic. These include the legislated and enforced imposition of socialistic government policies such as wealth tax, green-new-deal state programmes, Orwellian surveillance and control of citizens, and so on.

In essence, the key concept behind the key doctrines and applications of the Great Reset is a 21st Century form of Radical Socialism.

What is Socialism?

The word ‘socialism’ is seldom used in 1st world countries with politicians and others favouring the label  ‘Progressive Liberalism’. In essence, the two terms encompass the same range of ideologies.  It is not easy to provide one generally accepted definition of socialism but the following will do for this article; It is a system in which, through a democratic form of government, every person in the community has an equal share and ownership of the various elements of production.

Socialism, as opposed to Fascism, is implemented through democratically elected governments. However, to implement socialistic reform those elected governments need to control and centralise. Radical Socialism/Progressive Liberalism, by its very nature, is in many ways the antithesis of free-market Capitalism. A reasonable definition of Capitalism is ‘an economic system in which all or most of the means of production are privately owned and operated, and the investment of capital and the production, distribution, and prices of goods and services are determined mainly in a free market, rather than by the state.

So, to better understand the 21st version of Socialism just take the definition of Capitalism and reverse it. Something like: Socialism is an economic system in which all or most of the means of production are owned and operated by the state rather than privately, and the investment of capital and the production, distribution, and prices of goods and services are determined mainly by the state rather than a free market.

No wonder then that Klause Schwab, of the World Economic Forum, the man who coined the phrase ‘The Great Reset’ wrote: ‘To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism’

Underpinning much of what passes today as Socialism is what used to be called Cultural Marxism.

This political and social ideology promotes the idea that the old must be destroyed to build the new.

So when people speak of systemic problems, such as racism, needing to be eradicated, what they are saying is that the old systems and institutions must be destroyed, often violently, before the new can be established. In the United States of America, President Trump contends that the Washington political swamp must be drained while his opponents claim that systemic racism, gender prejudice, and so on, must be eradicated. Both are expressions of the idea that the old must be destroyed to build the new.

More specifically, the Cultural Marxism of our day is targeting such things as gender assigned at birth (where children’s gender is determined at birth by their genital attributes), marriage and the nuclear family, capitalistic economic dominance etc. Some of these issues are openly embraced by political parties such as the Democrats in the USA but often fly under the false flags of organisations such as Black Lives Matter.

Here, in my home country of South Africa, Marxist-flavored Socialism is promoted in various degrees of radicalism by the African National Congress (ANC), the South African Communist Party (SACP) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). However, the socialism that the Great Reset seeks to unleash is not limited to the USA and RSA, it is global.

Globalism

Nationalism champions national sovereignty, self-governance, and the belief that government should be limited and localised rather than global and centralised. Globalism, on the other hand, is a liberal and authoritarian desire for some form and degree of ‘one-world’ government which minimises national sovereignty and self-governance. It favours, amongst other things, open borders, free-trade zones, interventionism, and extensive foreign aid.

So, what the advocates of The Great Reset seek to bring about are globalism and radical socialism.

Not Everything is Either Entirely Good or Bad

Most of us tend to try to paint everything as either black or white and people as either good or bad. However, not every idea espoused by Socialism is bad and not every idea promoted by Capitalism is good. Not all Socialists are bad people and not all Nationalist Capitalists are good people. And the converse also obviously applies. When President Trump stated that not everyone attending an ostensibly right-wing political rally was bad he was not saying that the KKK participants were good but that there were many good conservative people in the crowd (the majority by far as it turned out).

Also, people can have affiliations, policies and practices you and I might find ‘bad’ but they would claim that their motives are ‘good’. For instance, it is hard to argue that Capitalism does not foster financial inequality or that some form of state-sponsored social aid is necessary, particularly in a 3rd world country. Environmental activism is no doubt needed to some extent to prevent global catastrophe and intra-national cooperation is vital to combat things such as a pandemic.

There is a continuum of views, convictions, and motivations in the political spectrum and very few forms of pure Capitalism or Socialism exist today.

However, politics and economics are important and life-affecting so it is important to understand something of the political and economic issues of the world in which we live.

Moreover, the ideologies and movements that fly under the flag of The Great Reset have a huge potential impact for Christians in general and the church in particular. When I was a young man it was often said that the two things a pastor should keep out of the pulpit are politics and money. This is good advice if it refers to party political partisanship and money-squeezing manipulation but to avoid the bigger and broader subjects of politics and economics is to present the Gospel in an unnatural vacuum.

What is at Stake

Radical Socialism or Social Marxism, call it what you will, is profoundly humanistic and agnostic at best but more often blatantly atheistic. Some politicians and political movements profess a form of Christianity that usually proves itself to be mildly religious and certainly not biblical, Jesus-centred, bible-believing Christianity.

A tree is known by its fruit (Matthew 12:33) and a social ideology is known by its objectives and programmes.

So, consider some of the ‘fruit’ of The Great Reset.

  • Strong prejudice against the Christian church and its members including tax legislation, right to gather, and state control.
  • Anti-family legislation and initiatives such as same-sex unions, abortion on demand, Gender identity rights of minor children, and so on.
  • Aggressive anti-law-and-order behaviour from disrespect for police officers and courts of law to armed civilian control of parts of cities, disregard for legal regulations governing demonstrations and rallies, and wanton violence against people and property.
  • Freedom of expression withheld from righteous people and used with impunity to serve the cause of societal disruption.
  • Massive distortion of truth, the unabashed proliferation of fake news, blatant manipulation of statistics and data, and hateful rhetoric.
  • The de-Christianising of school curricula, government traditions, and national constitutions.
  • Centralisation and ownership of property and the means of production by the state and the resultant disenfranchisement of entrepreneurs and innovators.
  • Gun control for responsible citizens while armed criminals abound.
  • Open borders and uncontrolled people movements across the globe.
  • Executive powers conferred on state institutions and world organisations at the expense of national citizens.
  • State ownership of land, the Reserve Bank, electricity and water provision, education, transport, and mineral resources.
  • Economic and social discrimination against minority ethnic and religious groups.
  • And the list goes on…

In short  what we are likely to experience under Secular Marxism (Radical Socialism) is at first an erosion and then a denial and suppression of Christian-Judeo beliefs, values, freedoms, and rights.

The Third Way

Nationalistic Capitalism has its failings and Global Socialism has serious implications and problems, but there is a third form of world and national order that is largely ignored by the leaders of nations… the Kingdom of God. When challenged by the Roman authority of his day, the Lord Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). Concerning the way believers are to counter the assault of world-systems, the Apostle Paul wrote: ‘For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does. The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world’ (2 Corinthians 10:3-4). Also, Peter addressed his letters (1 Peter 1:1 and 2:11) to ‘God’s elect, strangers in the world’ and urged them to live as ‘aliens and strangers in the world’.

This alternate kingdom was inaugurated when Jesus was born into the world and will continue until he comes again in glory. Its values and laws are the opposite of godless Socialism and greedy Capitalism. Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life and his kingdom is everlasting and his dominion endures through all generations (Psalm 145:13).

Everyone who is born-again of the Spirit of God is a member of this kingdom with dual yet subordinate citizenship in an earthly nation. We live in the world but we are not of the world. The world often seems to be a circus with the clowns running the show, but we live in that circus. We might be walking ankle-deep through Elephant poo, dodging mad clowns, and desperately trying to find a way out, but we cannot avoid being in the circus. The only way we can make sense of our sojourn through this insanity is to hold fast to the values of our king and to strive to influence our physical world with his ways and Gospel.

The Great Reset in a Bigger Context

The Great Reset that the World Economic Forum promotes is not THE reset and its not great at all. Aeons ago, when human iniquity had become intolerable, God reset the physical world and the instrument he used was the Great Flood (Genesis 6:6-8). Then, thousands of years later, he reset the world spiritually by coming personally as Jesus Christ of Nazareth, dying to atone for the rebellion of mankind, and rising from the dead so that all who choose to can be born again of the spirit into eternal life.

And God has a third and final Great Reset planned; it goes by several names but is most often referred to as ‘the great and awesome day of the Lord’ (Malachi 4:5).

Zephania 1:14-18

“The great day of the Lord is near – near and coming quickly.  Listen! The cry on the day of the Lord will be bitter, the shouting of the warrior there. That day will be a day of wrath, a day of distress and anguish, a day of trouble and ruin, a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and blackness, a day of trumpet and battle cry against the fortified cities and against the corner towers.  I will bring distress on the people and they will walk like blind men because they have sinned against the Lord. Their blood will be poured out like dust and their entrails like filth.  Neither their silver nor their gold will be able to save them on the day of the Lord’s wrath. In the fire of his jealousy, the whole world will be consumed, for he will make a sudden end of all who live in the earth.”

I suspect that day is almost upon us but before this last and greatest ‘reset’ occurs there will be a Great Revival. My eyes are straining for that and I am starting to see distinct signs of its imminence. So, instead of fearing the so-called Great Reset, let’s anticipate with excitement the soon-coming Great Revival.

He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus. The grace of the Lord Jesus be with God’s people. Amen. (Revelation 22:20-21).

The Great Reset Read More »

TruthTalks

Politics, the Pulpit and People

It is often said that sex and politics should be taboo topics in the church, so should politics be off-limits for preachers?

Politics is commonly defined as ‘the activities associated with the governance of a country or province’. If this is how we understand ‘politics’, then of course all Christians should be interested and concerned with how their country is governed. In Romans 13 Paul instructs believers to submit to governing authorities, and in 1 Timothy 2 he urges us to pray for everyone in authority ‘that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness’

If you would prefer to HEAR this message, you can click on the play button below and listen to this short (7 minute) interview I gave on this topic..

If you prefer reading it, then continue on…

…On this basis, Christians should engage with politics. The extent of this engagement will range from simply being good citizens, all the way through to being career politicians. However, Christian leaders and preachers are not primarily politicians, and rather have the responsibility of helping their people to determine what constitutes good governance and what role they, as individuals, need to play in the political life of their nation. They also need to teach into how we are to react and respond to ungodly government. However, when it comes to preaching, there does seem to be a line that the church should not cross; the line between national or provincial politics, and party politics.

Vote For ChristJust as the pulpit should not be a forum for selling things or promoting secular interests, just so it should not be used for peddling a particular political persuasion. In South Africa we are about to hold provincial elections and I, like all responsible citizens, will be casting my vote. I have a decided preference for one of the political parties contesting the elections and I feel at liberty in sharing my views, on a one-on-one basis with friends and family.

However, I would be abusing my privilege and mandate as a preacher if, in a sermon, I tried to persuade the congregation to vote for the party of my choice. Rather, my role within the church should be to set out the values and principles that govern how a Christian should vote.

What then are these principles and how should we apply them?

  1. We as Christians have a duty to cast our votes. Abstaining is, in almost all circumstances, just a way of shirking the responsibility of being a good citizen, and we as Jesus-followers should be exemplary citizens.
  2. We need to evaluate the political parties competing for our votes and decide which one is worth supporting. When there is more than one party that has a decided chance of winning then we should vote for the party that best embraces core biblical governmental values and has sincere believers in its executive.

What do I mean by core biblical governmental values?

I mean things such as integrity, honesty, work ethic, economic common sense, freedom of religion and expression, accountability to law and constitution, lack of corruption, lack of racial or minority group prejudice, and so on. As Christians, we all have views on things such as gay marriage, abortion,capital punishment and things of this nature, but I do not see these as ‘core’ governmental values. But if you do, then you would need to add them to your set of criteria against which to evaluate each political party.

When there is little to no chance of any party other than the majority or ruling party winning the elections, and that particular party fails to meet core Christian values, then we need to give serious consideration to voting for a strong opposition party. The proviso of course is that the opposition party needs to meet the same criteria established for your evaluation.

If there is an ostensibly ‘Christian’ party in the running then they should be worthy of support provided they have shown themselves to be true to what they say they believe, and also provided that they are serious contenders to either win the election of be a viable opposition party. Sadly, often such parties are just too small and poorly resourced to be regarded as serious and viable contenders.

So, to sum up, it is my opinion that politics in a general sense is indeed something with which we as Christians should engage. Party politics, on the other hand are outside of the church’s mandate yet should be of concern to all individual Christians as part of our responsibility as citizens.
We all need to cast our votes and we should do so in a way which will best yield godly governance in our province and nation.

 

Politics, the Pulpit and People Read More »

About Me

My name is Christopher Peppler and I was born in Cape Town, South Africa in 1947. While working in the financial sector I achieved a number of business qualifications from the Institute of Bankers, Damelin Management School, and The University of the Witwatersrand Business School. After over 20 years as a banker, I followed God’s calling and joined the ministry full time. After becoming a pastor of what is now a quite considerable church, I  earned an undergraduate theological qualification from the Baptist Theological College of Southern Africa and post-graduate degrees from two United States institutions. I was also awarded the Doctor of Theology in Systematic Theology from the University of Zululand in 2000.

Four years before that I established the South African Theological Seminary (SATS), which today is represented in over 70 countries and has more than 2 500 active students enrolled with it. I presently play an role supervising Masters and Doctoral students.

I am a passionate champion of the Christocentric or Christ-centred Principle, an approach to biblical interpretation and theological construction that emphasises the centrality of Jesus

I have been happily married to Patricia since the age of 20, have two children, Lance and Karen, a daughter-in-law Tracey, and granddaughters Jessica and Kirsten. I have now retired from both church and seminary leadership and devote my time to writing, discipling, and the classical guitar.

If you would like to read my testimony to Jesus then click HERE.