Reforming structure for revival

Theme: Doctrine and structure in times of revival
“…how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth.” Timothy 3:15
Since the days of Charles Finney pastors have engaged in the following sort of discussions – I certainly have. “If you want revival then you need to hold a revival.” “What do you mean by hold a revival?” “Well, advertise that you will be holding meetings every night for twenty-one days. Get in a top class evangelist from overseas. Hire a group of professional musicians for the duration. Things like that.” If you study how many of the recent ‘revivals’ started, you will find something very similar to this method. But is this God’s way? I don’t think it is.
The great revivals of modern history were characterised by spontaneity and divine initiation. Men and women didn’t decide to ‘hold a revival’; God decided to revive His church according to His methods and His timetable.
In my previous blog post I wrote of David’s Tent as a type of the church and I made the point that revival of the presence of God must be accompanied by a restoration of truth and a reformation of structure. The biblical history of David’s Tent is fascinating. Originally, the Ark of the Covenant, representing the presence of God, was in the Holy of Holies within the Tabernacle. The structure of this mobile temple was quite complex. There were three areas: an outer court, an inner court called the Holy Place and a restricted area called the Holy of Holies. The outer court contained the brazen alter of sacrifice and the laver of water. These stand as types of salvation through the atonement of Jesus Christ, and water baptism as the initiatory rite of the church. The inner court contained the Table of Shewbread, The Golden Minora, and the Incense Altar. These stood as types for communion with God and each other, the Word of God, and Prayer and Worship. Behind a thick curtain, in the Holy of Holies, stood the Ark of the Covenant as a type of the presence of God.
Working model of the Tabernacle – Outer court is seen here
One day, when the Canaanites were at war with the Israelites, and winning, the people of God rashly decided to carry the Ark of the Covenant into battle with them. They hoped that the enemy would flee when they saw the Ark, but instead they captured it and drove the Israelites back. From that day on the Tabernacle was without the Ark of the Covenant. It had the structure, the form, and the contents but it lacked the one vital element, the presence of God. What a picture of religion – rites, rituals and regulations but no presence of God!
Sometime later the Canaanites returned the Ark and David gave instructions that it should be brought up to Jerusalem. However, the Tabernacle was someplace else, and so David built a tent to house the Ark – the Tent of David. By all accounts this was a very simple structure with the sole purpose of providing a place for the presence of God. This to me is a type of the sort of structure we should have in times of revival – simple, uncomplicated and dedicated solely to providing a place for the glorious presence of God. Instead of setting up endless meetings, importing preachers and laying on professional musicians, we should be getting out of the way and keeping it simple. What do you think? I would love to hear your views so please post a comment or two on the blog.

Picture of Christopher Peppler

Christopher Peppler



2 thoughts on “Reforming structure for revival”

  1. I like this Chris. We should allow the Holy Spirit to move as He chooses. I always feel worship is a good way to enter into His presence but perhaps I am biased. 🙂

  2. Pingback: Revival Revisited | Truth Is The Word

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Weekly Highlights

About Me

My name is Christopher Peppler and I was born in Cape Town, South Africa in 1947. While working in the financial sector I achieved a number of business qualifications from the Institute of Bankers, Damelin Management School, and The University of the Witwatersrand Business School. After over 20 years as a banker, I followed God’s calling and joined the ministry full time. After becoming a pastor of what is now a quite considerable church, I  earned an undergraduate theological qualification from the Baptist Theological College of Southern Africa and post-graduate degrees from two United States institutions. I was also awarded the Doctor of Theology in Systematic Theology from the University of Zululand in 2000.

Four years before that I established the South African Theological Seminary (SATS), which today is represented in over 70 countries and has more than 2 500 active students enrolled with it. I presently play an role supervising Masters and Doctoral students.

I am a passionate champion of the Christocentric or Christ-centred Principle, an approach to biblical interpretation and theological construction that emphasises the centrality of Jesus

I have been happily married to Patricia since the age of 20, have two children, Lance and Karen, a daughter-in-law Tracey, and granddaughters Jessica and Kirsten. I have now retired from both church and seminary leadership and devote my time to writing, discipling, and the classical guitar.

If you would like to read my testimony to Jesus then click HERE.