Search in ARCHIVES

Christopher Peppler

come and see

Come and See

come and see

We all know the Great Commission and have heard it countless times from preachers. The Mark 16:15-18 version is “… go into all the world and preach the Good News”. Missions and evangelism, right? Who must do this? All of us of course. Well, how are we doing at this? According to the latest statistics from Barna and Bible.org, the answer has to be “Not so well, I am ashamed to say.”

  • Less than 2% of Christians are involved with the ministry of evangelism.
  • 95% of all Christians have never won a soul to Christ.
The reasons people have given for failing miserably to ‘evangelise’ are illuminating:
  1. Discomfort with evangelism.
  2. The feeling that it is disrespectful.
  3. Lack of training.
  4. Lack of relationships with non-believers.
  5. Fear of rejection.

What is the Problem?

So what’s the problem? Are we all lazy and rebellious? Or, perhaps we just don’t understand what we are actually called to be and do.

Ephesians 4:11 says that the Lord has “given some to be evangelists”. Some means ‘not all’ and so for most of us, the commission to ‘evangelise’ in a formal sense doesn’t seem to apply. Perhaps we should start with Acts 1:8 instead of the Mark passage. “you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.

Some are called to be evangelists, just as only some are called to be prophets or Teachers, and so on. However, ALL of us are called to be witnesses … and I certainly do not mean Jehovah’s Witnesses!

A witness is a person who testifies to what they have seen and heard, first-hand (Ref John 3:32). So the real question is not ‘How do we evangelise’, but ‘What have we personally seen and heard of the Lord Jesus Christ, the one to whom we are called to bear witness?’ (John 4:39-42) So, perhaps the real reason Christians do not witness is because they have nothing to witness to. If we are born again of the Spirit and have a genuine relationship with the Lord Jesus, then we have something to share. If we do not, then how can we be a witness?

The ‘how to’ is natural and not difficult: ‘in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect.’ (1 Peter 3:15) And here is a wonderful thought – Nobody can argue with your personal witness. They may think you strange, or ‘religious’, but they cannot dispute your experience. We often get rejected when we try to argue someone into the Kingdom of God, but sincere sharing is evidence of caring.  It might require special training to present a systematic version of the ‘gospel’ (i.e. EE3 courses), but witnessing does not.

So with that in mind, please allow me to present John 1:40 -50 to you from a new perspective.

John 1:40-50

‘Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, was one of the two who heard what John had said and who had followed Jesus. The first thing Andrew did was to find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah” (that is, the Christ). And he brought him to Jesus.

Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas” (which, when translated, is Peter).

The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, he said to him, “Follow me.”

Philip, like Andrew and Peter, was from the town of Bethsaida. Philip found Nathanael and told him, “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote — Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”  “Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?” Nathanael asked. “Come and see,” said Philip.

When Jesus saw Nathanael approaching, he said of him, “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.” “How do you know me?” Nathanael asked. Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.” Then Nathanael declared, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the King of Israel.” Jesus said, “You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You shall see greater things than that.”’

This is the story of how Jesus called his first few disciples. However, if we change the perspective, we can apply it to ourselves. When we ‘make a disciple’, we should not consider them our followers. Of course not, because they are Jesus-followers and our role is to teach them to model on him. We often hear the term, “I lead him to the Lord” and this expresses what I am saying; we introduce people to Jesus and help them comprehend and apply what he says and does. The words my friend used in introducing Jesus to me were “I have found the Lord” I thought him daft at the time, but soon after this I visited him in his home and heard his ‘testimony’ to Jesus.

Andrew brought Peter to Jesus and Phillip brought Nathanael to Jesus with the words “Come and see”.

I just love the simplicity of it. “I have found the Lord”, “Say what now”, “Yes, come and see.” From there on Jesus made a disciple of each of them. ‘Come and see’ is the heart of evangelistic witnessing. Say we encounter someone having a hard time. Instead of offering our own Dr Phillesque platitudes, we respond with something like, “I know someone who can truly help you. His name is Jesus. May I tell you how I met him and how he has changed my life?” I certainly do not want to come over as crass, insensitive, or judgmental, but if you cannot say something similar then you have no witness. And if this is the case, then it is not because you haven’t received the right kind of teaching or learned a methodology, it is because you have not yet met Jesus. To put it another way, you have not been born again.

This idea probably sounds unpalatable to someone with a long-term relationship with a church or denomination. Some churches do not speak about being born again and Jesus plays a secondary role in their religion of good works and church loyalty. There is no getting around it though if you at least believe the bible is trustworthy. You see, just two chapters further on in John’s Gospel, Jesus says these words to Nicodemus: “I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again”(John 3:3). Again in verse seven he says “You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again’”

Conclusion

So here is how I see it. So many Christians (95%) have never introduced anyone to Jesus either because they have not been born again, or they do not realise that their job is to witness, not evangelise. It is tragic that so many church-going or nominal ‘Christians’ have never been born again. It is almost as sad that so many of those who have, labour under the misconception that they must be Gospel salespeople, well schooled in the art of persuasion and able to answer all the deep questions of life.

I won’t leave you guessing what being ‘born again’ means. I have written a comprehensive article on this subject and highly recommend you read it.

Once someone introduces us to the Lord Jesus Christ with a personal ‘come and see’, the Holy Spirit convinces, convicts and performs the miracle of new spiritual life. Once we possess this life and enjoy an ongoing, real-time, relationship with Jesus, we have something to witness to and someone to introduce with the words “come and see”.

Come and See Read More »

Feature image

The Nature of the Bible and How to Understand it

Top image

I have written on the nature of the bible before, but recently I have been questioned about three matters relating to this subject.

I have built ministry, church, and seminary on three foundational pillars – The Centrality of Jesus, the Bible’s authority, and dependence on the Holy Spirit. I have focused my work over the last decade largely on the centrality of Jesus and on the empowerment of the Holy Spirit, so perhaps I need to deal again with the nature of the bible.

Three Questions

A while ago a pastor friend of mine asked me to provide him with information on two questions he had to deal with. They were:

  1. Saturday as the Sabbath rather than Sunday
  2. The supremacy of the King James Version of the bible

Shortly after that, I was challenged in a bible study group with the theory that the Last Supper was actually on Wednesday and not Thursday. So that makes three queries in all, but all of them centre on the nature of the bible and how to understand it. Let me be a bit more specific.

Saturday as the Sabbath

It may be strange to many Jesus followers that some Christians regard Saturday as the only legitimate day for the church to gather for worship. After all, Jesus rose from the dead on a Sunday, the first church met on the first day of the week (Sunday) as recorded in Acts 20:7, and the church has worshipped on a Sunday from the end of the first century onwards. However, Seventh-Day Adventists and a few minor church groups worship on Saturdays rather than Sundays. The main reasons are that:

  1. In the Genesis creation account, God rested from his labour on Saturday (Genesis 2:2-3),
  2. The Saturday Sabbath was established in the Mosaic law as a sign of the covenant (Exodus 315-17), and
  3. The fourth of the Ten Commandments concerns honouring the Saturday Sabbath. (Exodus 20:8-11)

These are all true, but how we regard them today depends largely on how we interpret the scriptures. One of the three cardinal interpretive principles I have long adopted is what I have called Exhaustive Reference.

This means that we need to consult all of the bible before settling on an interpretation of any particular part.

So what does the New Testament teach on Sabbath observance?

Well, Colossians 2:16-17, Galatians 4:10-11, and Romans 14:5 all teach that Jesus-followers do not require a Saturday Sabbath.

The second of my interpretive keys is the Christocentric Principle – What Jesus did, said, or revealed of the nature and purpose of the Triune Godhead. Referring to himself, he said that “the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” (Matthew 12:8) He also said that “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.” (Mark 2:27-28)

The third interpretive principle is Context – what does a text mean in the context of history, culture, or its location in a biblical passage or book? Now, the Old Testament references are in the historical context of the Old Covenant of Law. The Apostle Paul says this of the Law … well, read this for yourself so that you can see the closer context of the full passage – Galatians 3:21-25.

So then, Saturday Sabbath observance comes from understanding the bible as a book of rules to be obeyed, rather than an unfolding revelation of God’s nature, character, purposes and plans. It also comes from applying interpretative principles other than the three I have articulated.

The supremacy of the King James Version of the bible

Whole books have been written by promoters and critics of the King James Version only idea. Good Reads lists 35 titles and it is revealing to read through these. But few of you have the time or inclination to read any one of these books so let me rather summarise the main arguments against the contention that the King James Version (KJV) is the only inspired, accurate and authorised version of the bible (Thanks to Co-pilot AI):

The KJV is Not the Most Accurate Translation:  The KJV was based on the Textus Receptus Greek manuscript, which is now considered less reliable than older and more accurate Greek manuscripts discovered since then. Modern translations, like the ESV, NASB, and NIV are considered more accurate as they are based on these newer, more reliable Greek and Hebrew sources.  Some KJV-only advocates believe the KJV corrects the Greek, but this is not supported and the KJV translators themselves did not make this claim.

The KJV Language is Outdated:  The KJV uses archaic language like “thee”, “thou”, and old English grammar that is difficult for modern readers to understand. Newer translations aim to convey the meaning in clear, contemporary English while remaining faithful to the original texts.

There are Many Reliable Modern Translations:  Reputable modern translations like the ESV, NASB, NIV, CSB, and NLT are considered accurate and trustworthy by most biblical scholars.   These translations use rigorous scholarly methods and are produced by teams of experts, not just a single translator. The existence of multiple translations is not a sign of corruption but reflects the difficulty of translating ancient languages into modern English.

The KJV Translators Did Not Claim Perfection:  The preface to the KJV itself acknowledges that no translation can be perfect, and the KJV translators did not claim their work was inerrant or superior to all other translations. The KJV translators would likely have been open to using modern translations, as they recognised the limitations of their own work.

The proponents of KJV only have their ‘proofs’ that show that the KJV is the best and that the modern translations are aberrant. What I want to point out, however, is that the KJV-only idea stems from a view of the nature of the bible and the way it should be understood. Those who view it as such see the bible as a transcript of the exact words of God imparted to the various biblical authors. In effect, they hold that God dictated the whole bible. If this were the case, there could be only one translation in every language. This is because divine oversight would have to be applied to the modern language versions if the exact word order, phrasing, and meaning were to be retained.

The Last Supper, on Wednesday or Thursday

For hundreds and hundreds of years churches and theologians worldwide have accepted that the Lord Jesus shared his last supper on the Thursday evening just after 6 pm, died on the cross at 3 pm Friday, and rose from the dead before dawn on Sunday. However, some scholars of late have argued for a Wednesday night Passover meal. Some argue that this helps reconcile apparent discrepancies between the Gospel accounts, particularly between John and the Synoptic Gospels. Others suggest that ‘preparation day’ in the Gospels (Mark 15:42, John 19:31) refers to preparation for the Passover, not the weekly Sabbath. Some also contend that it provides more time for the events described between the Last Supper and the crucifixion. Most Wednesday Passover advocates also believe that the interpretation of the three days and nights in the tomb is a definitive consideration and I will deal only with this last argument in this article.

Three Days and Nights

The key verse cited is Matthew 12:40, which cites Jesus saying, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth”. Three consecutive days and nights totalling 72 hours necessitates a Thursday crucifixion and therefore a Wednesday Last Supper. Underlying this contention is a trust in oft-used statements like, “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense, but take every word at its primary, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context clearly indicate otherwise,” (David L. Cooper). Another favourite is, “take it literally unless it is obviously meant metaphorically or symbolically”. (source unknown). Well, good luck with that when trying to understand the Book of Revelation!

The foundational belief underpinning such sayings and practices relates to the nature of the bible. As I mentioned before, If the bible is divinely dictated then we should understand everything in it just as it is stated.

So three days and three nights mean a period of 72 hours and nothing else. However, Adam Clarke wrote the following in his commentary:

‘Evening and morning, or night and day, is the Hebrew phrase for a natural day, which the Greeks termed nuchthemeron. The very same quantity of time which is here termed three days and three nights, and which in reality, was only one whole day, a part of two others, and two whole nights, is termed three days and three nights, in the book of Esther: Go; neither eat nor drink THREE DAYS, NIGHT or DAY, and so I will go in unto the king: 4:16.  Afterward it follows  5:1. On the THIRD DAY, Esther stood in the inner court of the king’s house’.

There are other similar examples elsewhere in the Old Testament, for instance, Ezekiel 32:7-8 re Egypt, Isaiah 13:9-10 re Babylon,  Joel 2:30-31 re Jerusalem in about 800 BC, and Danial 8:10 re Jerusalem in about 553 BC. (Also Gen 42:17-18; 1 Sam 30:12-13; 1 Kings 20:29; 2 Chronicles 10:5, 12). Based on this evidence, and Jewish rabbinical writing, Adam Clarke concludes ‘Thus, then, three days and three nights, according to this Jewish method of reckoning, included any part of the first day; the whole of the following night; the next day and its night; and any part of the succeeding or third day.’

My Understanding of the Nature and Purpose of the Bible

These three examples highlight that our interpretation of biblical texts is often influenced by how we understanding of the nature and purpose of the bible. Therefore, I need to set out my own understanding of this. I have written before on this subject, but for those who don’t want to read the entire article, here are the main points relevant to this current article.

The bible is a record of the perfect Word of God, in the imperfect words of human beings. Moreover, people who lived in a particular age and thought in terms of the prevailing world-view, recorded these imperfect words. It should be no surprise that the authors used pre-scientific concepts and flawed referencing and reporting methods. Scholars refer to this as cultural conditioning, but it goes beyond that to human frailty and limitation. This would constitute a real problem for those who believe that God dictated the scriptures, or directly impressed the thought on the scribes minds. These anomalies and apparent contradictions could, if admitted to, constitute a crisis of faith for those holding such a narrow view of biblical inerrancy.

The books of the bible are a holy collaboration between God and the people he chose to work with. Just as Jesus Christ, the living Word of God, is both man and God, so the scriptures are both a human and divine production; the written Word of God.

The bible is a compendium of many styles and genres, ranging from stories, through poetry, to teachings. Included in the mix, are also histories, prophecies, wise sayings, and apocalyptic visions. Some books, like Job and Song of Songs, defy classification. Some of the biblical characters are wicked, others are simply flawed, while yet others are saints. There are both positive and negative examples of character and behaviour and only sometimes does the author explain which aspects can be taken as models and which are warnings.

Measurements, times, periods, and so on are not necessarily scientifically accurate. For instance, the genealogies do not all contain an exact chronological timeline. Sometimes they are arranged into groups for effect, or they leave out generations to make some or other point. So, we cannot add back through the genealogies and conclude that Adam was created 6,000 years ago.

Some descriptions in the bible are symbolic and not a presentation of physical reality. For example, the devil probably does not look like a huge red dragon confined in the end times for exactly 1,000 years (Revelation 20:2-3). An enormous red dragon is an excellent symbolic depiction of the devil, and the 1,000 years represent the entire church age, starting when Jesus restrained Satan at the crucifixion.

It is obvious from the above that the bible cannot be read and understood primarily as a theological dictionary, chronological story, or collection of promises. Instead, the bible, in its totality, is a source of divine revelation concerning Jesus and his way of salvation. It is also the source of spiritual knowledge, advice, admonition, and encouragement. It is the written collection of writings that God uses to help us come to know Jesus, grow to be like him, and help others to do likewise. It is rich and complex, yet relevant and meaningful to all generations. It is an indispensable part of the Christian Faith and can rightly be called The Written Word of God.

Understand the Bible

We can only properly understand this marvellous book if we apply the principles of context, exhaustive reference, and Christocentricity.  Context involves the interpretation of a biblical passage with reference to the history, geography, and culture of its original time of writing, and also with reference to its literary style and the logical flow of thought contained in the passages that both precede and follow it. Christocentricity is the interpretation of a passage with reference to what Jesus said, did and revealed of the nature and character of the Godhead.

Conclusion

I chose the three examples of Saturday Sabbath, King James Only, and The Last Supper because I thought they would, in themselves, be of interest to you. However, they are also current examples of the importance of properly understanding the nature of the bible. It is one of those bedrock doctrines that affect so much of what we as believers think and do. It probably rates in importance with how we view the nature and character of God the Father, the divinity of Jesus Christ the Son, and the role and necessity of the Holy Spirit in our lives and ministries.

The Nature of the Bible and How to Understand it Read More »

The Seven Days of Grace that Changed Humanity

In times of chaotic change and stress we need to dig our faith deeper into the rich soil of our Christian heritage. This article is about the historic events that form the soil in which we are planted.

There are seven crucial events in early Christian history, each occurring in a day, that set the Christian faith apart from all religious systems. They not only distinguished Christianity, but also changed the very nature and destiny of humanity. Furthermore, these seven events repeat in every generation of the church and in the lives of all who are followers of the Lord Jesus Christ. As such, they should be celebrated in the communal life of every church and in the lived reality of every Jesus-follower. Here they are, in the order in which they appeared on the timeline of history.

1.  Birthday

The world changed when Jesus Christ was born to Mary in Bethlehem Judea because on that day God the Son became incarnate in human form. We traditionally celebrate this on the 25th of December each year although the actual day of his birth was more likely to have been in September 3 BC. The religious and secular world adopted Christmas Day as a holiday celebrating family, food, and gifts. Some delight in telling us that in ancient times the god Saturn was honoured on that day. It doesn’t matter what month or which day of the week we set aside to remember and thank God for the wonder of the incarnation, so long as we never forget that our faith started with the birth of Jesus into the world.

Our Christian lives also start with Jesus and a New Birth. We acknowledge that Jesus is God incarnate, our Saviour, and Lord of our life. In response the Holy Spirit, the 3rd person of the Godhead, breathes his life into us. For the individual, this is also a momentous day and one we should rejoice over often.

2.  Baptism Day

About 30 years after his birth, Jesus presented himself to John the Baptist to be baptised in the Jordan River. This was the second crucial day on the Christian history timeline. In the simple act of immersion in water, Jesus drew the Old Covenant to a close and initiated a new right of passage into the Kingdom of God.

Matthew 3:13-15  Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John. But John tried to deter him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?”  Jesus replied, “Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfil all righteousness.” Then John consented’. John was baptising as a sign of repentance from sin and so he could not conceive of why Jesus, the sinless Lamb of God, the one who came to take away the sin of the world, would need to be baptised. Jesus had to inform him that this baptism was to fulfil all righteousness and to end the system of right standing with God through works, rituals, and laws.

In our own Christian lives, the first step of faith occurs when we are Born Again of the Spirit, The second step is when we publically acknowledge this through baptism. In that act, we symbolically die to the old self-religion of works and philosophies and rise out of the waters as a testimony that by the Grace of Jesus, we are now alive to him and his kingdom.

Church members do not have any one day in the year when they gather together to remember Jesus’ baptism by John the Baptist. This acknowledgement and celebration occurs whenever we gather together and witness a man, woman, or child being baptised in Jesus’ name. It is a great pity when churches and believers trivialise or repurpose baptism as an infant initiation rite into the church or as a replacement for the Old Testament obligation of circumcision. We do ourselves a disservice and we dishonour the 2nd Day of Grace on the timeline of Christian history.

3.  Crucifixion Friday

The 3rd Day of Grace occurred sometime around April 30 AD when Jesus was in His mid-thirties. Within days of each other, Jesus Christ, the incarnate God the Son, was crucified by the Romans on Golgotha, and then rose from the dead and walked bodily out of the tomb in which he had been incarcerated.

On Crucifixion Friday at 3:00 pm, Jesus took his last breath as a man of mere flesh and blood. Luke 23:46  ‘Jesus called out with a loud voice, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit.” When he had said this, he breathed his last’.

In that awful and almost unthinkable moment, God the Son took upon himself the sin of the rebellion of all humanity. He satisfied the requirements of divine justice which he, as a member of the Godhead, had established at the very beginning of creation.

In Adam mankind had sinned in treasonous rebellion against God and had incurred the penalty of a life apart from his creator; a penalty passed on to all of his progeny, the entire human race. On that fatal day, the human spirit died to God for ‘in Adam all die’ (1 Corinthians 15:22)

We were all born into this world suffering from spirits dead to God. We are physically and mentally alive in the world, but spiritually unable to hear his voice unaided and helpless to find our way back to him without his direct intervention. Potentially, through what Jesus achieved on the Cross, we are legally entitled to approach the Almighty, yet unable to do so. This is because God is spirit and dwells in high heavenly realms, and we are born spiritually dead. Jesus said to Nicodemus, the premier theologian of Israel, “I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.” (John 3:5-7)

4.  Victory Saturday

As members of the Christian Church, we commemorate the crucifixion of Jesus on a day in late March or early April each year. However, we have no memorial or celebration on the day after ‘Good Friday’. On that day, the body of Jesus lay in a stone tomb on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Most Christians have no idea that in the spiritual realm, Jesus was not sleeping the cold sleep of death, but was actively performing a momentous act.

There is seldom any sound teaching on this so we don’t often hear anything about the events of Easter Saturday. If we do catch a whisper in the intellectual wind and try to research the subject, we tend to get lost in the complex and convoluted commentaries on biblical texts that have a bearing on the subject. I want to spend some time on this Fourth Day of Grace because it is such an under-exposed subject yet one of great significance and importance.

A few biblical texts point us in the right direction but they are difficult to grasp adequately, so we tend to pass them by. For instance:

Hebrews 2:14 ‘Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death — that is, the devil.’ In what way did the crucifixion destroy the power of the devil? Did something subsequent to what the world witnessed on Good Friday occur that ‘destroyed’ Satan’s power over death? If so, what was this and when did it occur?

1 Peter 3:18-20 ‘He was put to death in the body but made alive by the Spirit, through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison who disobeyed long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built’. Who were these spirits and when and where did this occur?

Then to add to our confusion, the late 3rd century Apostles Creed of the church states that  Jesus ‘was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried; he descended to the dead. On the third day, he rose again.’ Not only were the words ‘descended to the dead/hell’ not in the original creed but they are based on a poor interpretation of Ephesians 4:9 which contains, in brackets, the words ‘What does “he ascended” mean except that he also descended to the lower, earthly regions.’ Within the context of this passage, it appears obvious that Paul meant that Jesus could hardly ascend to Heaven if he had not previously descended into the lower dimension of earthly existence. However, at least this section of the Apostles Creed gives us the insight that its drafters believed that Jesus entered into a spiritual realm between his physical death on Friday and his resurrection on Sunday.

Colossians 2:13-15

However, the most revealing text concerning what happened on the Saturday of Easter weekend is Colossians 2:13-15 where Paul wrote:

When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, having cancelled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross’.

This a notoriously difficult passage to interpret, there are numerous opinions on what it means, and detailed and complex arguments derive from the use and tense of the Greek words used. N.T. Wright analyses the passage from most perspectives, as does Wayne Grudem in his systematic theology.

First, let’s consider the immediate context of the passage. In the very next verse (vs 16) Paul wrote: ‘Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.’ The three things cited by Paul are all religious observances thought by Jews and some others to be essential to a right standing with God.  No, says Paul, you don’t need ritualistic obedience. Why? Because Jesus has set you free from all this. And the source of that freedom is what Jesus did as described in the preceding three verses. He cancelled the regulations of religion and its power over us by dying on the cross and then, the next day, by publically disarming and triumphing over the devil and his powers and principalities. We were all dead to God because of our sin of rebellion and the religious code of Judaism served to convict and remind us that we were unable to change this reality through obedience to rituals, and good works. (Galatians 3:19-25) When Jesus died on the cross he was satisfying the requirement of divine law. You see, when Adam walked with God in Eden the Lord made a covenant with him. This offered the benefits of life, earth’s bounty, and God’s presence forever. However, it also contained a penalty clause: “If you break this covenant obligation of trusting and obeying me then you will certainly die”. (Genesis 2:17) This penalty was entirely satisfied by Jesus’ selfless sacrificial act on our behalf.

In dying on the cross Jesus took away the devil’s main weapon of condemning humanity because they were guilty, cut off from God, unable to change this reality, and therefore under his power and dominion.

But wait there is more! (as cheesy salesmen say).

Jesus cancelled the debt of the Law on Friday at 3 pm, but on Saturday he strode spiritually into the realm of Satan with the armies of Heaven behind him and stripped the devil of all authority over humanity. He also banned Satan from ever again appearing before the throne of God the Father to plead his case of absolution from the guilt of rebellion by virtue of humanity’s lawlessness.

The scene is reminiscent of a military Court Marshal. See the scene: The Lord Jesus Christ stands before Satan and his evil hosts, with the angels of Heaven behind him and declares: “Know this Satan. I have personally settled the penalty on behalf of all humanity by becoming a man of flesh and blood, perfectly obeying and trusting my Father, and then dying under the most extreme conditions imaginable. In that act I, as it were, nailed to the cross of Golgotha a notice that read ‘Fully satisfied’. In so doing I wiped out the condemnation and penalty of the violation of the divine covenant. I have won the right for all humans to step out from under the condemnation of the law of religion and in me and through me to once again have eternal life. Death no longer has a sting in its devilish tail and you no longer have any authority”. Then reaching forward, Jesus stripped the insignia of rank from the devil’s shoulders, removed his armour and weapons and in a thunderous voice declared, “It is done! Now be gone!”

The implications of this for us are vast. If we are born again of the Spirit in and through Jesus Christ then we need not fear death because for us it is just a portal into Heaven. We are no longer under the devil’s authority and he has no right to subjugate us in any way. We possess the delegated authority of the Lord Jesus and can command the powers and principalities of the demonic realm to leave us and to desist from troubling us. Praise God!

5.  Resurrection Sunday

I ended my comments on Crucifixion Friday by pointing out that because of it all men and women are no longer under the condemnation of the violated covenant. However, if it were not for Resurrection Sunday, we would be legally absolved but still spiritually dead!

We all know what this great day signifies and celebrate it annually because on that Day Jesus rose from the grave. He rose, not as a resuscitated man, but as a transformed man no longer restricted by time, space, or matter. He arose in the form that we shall have when we inhabit the new HeavenEarth in the age to come.

In his resurrection, Jesus became the second Adam, a man who would live forever. He became a template of one who could enter Heaven so that we too can enter Heaven when we die physically.

The cross signifies our freedom from death and the Law of Religion and the Empty Tomb signifies our new eternal life in the presence of God. What links us to this wonder is our confession of our sin of rebellion and our heart-felt request that God would breathe his life into us by his Spirit so that we can be born again into a new life in Christ Jesus.

6.  Ascension Day

In years gone by, churches used to celebrate Ascension Day with some form of congregational meeting. This does not seem to be the case nowadays with many churches. Although it may seem like the Ascension is only a conclusion to the Easter sequence of events, it is more. Its deeper significance is that the bodily ascension of Jesus from Earth to Heaven means that;

  • The Godhead now includes a representative of humanity. Jesus, God the Son, has included physicality in his makeup whereas before he was a spiritual being only. This is an astonishing thought!
  • We have Jesus as our intercessor at the Father’s throne. Romans 8:34 ‘Who is he that condemns? Christ Jesus, who died – more than that, who was raised to life — is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us’. This too is a wondrous truth that gives us great comfort and assurance.

Ascension Day deserves honour!

7.  The Day of Pentecost

Sadly, Pentecost Sunday also seems to have slipped from the community calendar for many churches. We commemorate the birth of Jesus and his crucifixion and resurrection, but we don’t honour the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and the birth of the church on Earth?

At the Tower of Babel God scattered the nations of  the world and gave them different languages. On the Day of Pentecost, he gathered people from the nations and united those who believed into one new nation, the Kingdom of God. He even evidenced a new language for his people, the church, that we call Tongues. On that day the power of the Holy Spirit was dispensed onto and into the people of God and in this power the church grew and went out into the world preaching the Gospel. (Acts 2)

During his time on Earth, the Lord Jesus depended entirely on the power of the Holy Spirit to achieve the things the Father directed him to do. The same applies to us. Without the anointing of the Spirit, we cannot do what we are called to do. We can’t even live Jesus-like lives of obedience and trust. Why then would we not want to remember and honour the Holy Spirit and rejoice in being part of the church that was birthed on that day?

Conclusion

I started this article by observing that in uncertain times we need to dig down into the rich soil of our Christian heritage. The more insecure the times, the more we need to dig down. It gives us stability and hope to realise again who we are in Christ Jesus. When we consider how God scheduled and executed his plan of salvation in past times, we can more easily believe that he can act in our times. I hope that this overview of parts of our shared history inspire and encourage you. God be with you.

 

 

The Seven Days of Grace that Changed Humanity Read More »

feature image

Choose This Day

top image

MY APOLOGIES TO INTERNATIONAL READERS, BUT THIS ARTICLE IS MAINLY FOR SOUTH AFRICANS

In just days from today, registered South African voters will make their way to their designated station and make their mark on three ballot papers. Almost all political pundits have billed this 2024 election as the most important in South African history. The 1994 election ended nationalist apartheid and opened the vote to all citizens. That election was certainly historic, but this 2024 election is monumental. Why? Because not only do we stand at the very edge of a social and economic abyss, but we also cast our vote for either Democracy or Marxist Socialism.

Why This Election is so Important

This might sound to you to be overdramatic and overstated, but consider the following: Most analysts predict a coalition government as the most likely outcome of the elections. The African National Congress (ANC) will likely remain the major party with 37% – 42% of the vote. To form a government, they’ll need to partner with a party or parties holding around 20%. There are two main options: an Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) combination (around 24% together), or a Democratic Alliance (DA) and Inkatha (IFP) and the balance of the Multi-Party Charter (MPC) combination (around 32% together). These two options represent different ideologies: Radical Socialism/Marxism (EFF and MK) and Conservative Democracy (DA and MPC).

Why do I contend that the one grouping represents Marxism and why is this such a problem for the nation? Well, here are some of the main negative features in the manifestos of EFF and MK:

  • Expropriation without compensation resulting in the nationalisation of land throughout the country. Not only would this remove the rights of individuals and corporations to own what they have paid for and developed, but it would also present the single biggest obstacle to international investment.
  • The nationalisation of banks, insurance companies, mines, the Reserve Bank and so on. This would place huge power and control in the hands of the government and individuals and clans within the government.
  • The change of the system of law from Anglo/Dutch to Traditional African Tribal. I see this as negative and not just different: Anglo-Dutch law is practised by all Western first-world countries, codified and standardised, with a hierarchical system in that it has appeal and high courts, and a focus on individual rights. Moreover, in South Africa, it is subject to the National Constitution as interpreted by a Constitutional Court. Traditional African law, on the other hand, is limited to some African nations and differs from country to country and even tribe to tribe, not codified and standardised, is more oral than documented, has no system of higher or appeals courts, more focused on group cohesion than individual rights, and not subject to the national constitution.
  • A conversion from a constitutional democracy to a system where the Parlament reigns supreme over even the courts of law. The sheer weight of the number of parliamentarians loyal to particular political parties would determine law and practice within the nation and not even the highest court would be able to annul or alter such promulgations.
  • A change to the Pension Funds Act so that their immense funds are used for ‘national development’. This would essentially steal the hard-won pensions of millions of people and reduce all pensioners to the lowest common denominator of quality of life.
  • Scrap the Independent Examinations Board for schools. This would mean that all learners in the nation would be subject to a woefully deficient and abysmally low standard of education. This would have profound effects on the development of the next generations and the wealth and future of the nation.
  • Open all borders to allow free movement of people across Africa. Just consider the migration problems we currently experience in the nation and the problems in countries such as the United Kingdom and the USA.
These changes would lead to a flight of capital and skills, causing a dramatic negative effect on foreign exchange rates, food insecurity, business, inflation, and so on. In the absence of a viable tax base, the government would probably print more and more money resulting in runaway inflation and failure to service national debt. It is no wonder that some have called this toxic combination of ANC, EFF, and MK the Doomsday Coalition.

Alternatively, an ANC, DA, and Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) (and balance of the MPC) coalition could lead to a slow but positive turnaround, if radical opposition parties don’t make the country ungovernable. Of course, five years as a junior partner to the ANC could discredit and all but wipe out the DA. However, here is a thought to consider: If the ANC only gets 37% of the vote then the DA, or Multi Party Charter, only needs 38% to have the right to form a government. This would position the ANC as a minority party and provide the DA and its coalition partners with greater power and a more favourable public profile.

So you can see that in this election the forces of radical ‘transformation’ (Marxism) are aligned against the forces of conservative democracy, with the ANC straddling the fence with one foot on the conservative side, but the bulk of its body falling over onto the radical side. Who wins and who loses will make a huge difference to the future of the nation and the well-being of all South Africans.

A Day of Individual Choice

The numerous polls in the last months presented different scenarios and outcomes. However, all that counts, literally, is that on election day each person registered to vote makes their mark according to their convictions. If all registered voters vote based on their conviction, rather than tradition, apathy, or race, then anything is possible.

Let me present two scriptural texts for your consideration:

  • Deuteronomy 30:19-20 “This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live and that you may love the Lord your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the Lord is your life, and he will give you many years in the land he swore to give to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob”.

The call of God through Moses was to the people of Israel to choose between their redeemer God or the gods of the nations around them. That was the specific context of the passage, but the principles presented apply to all God’s people of all ages.

On the 29th May 2024, all citizens of South Africa who registered to vote will have to choose between life and death, blessing or curses. No matter what they profess, the Doomsday Coalition leaders do not honour the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Peter, and Paul. They honour no god but their self-images which they have projected into society. They do not value biblical ethics or morality and their agendas are for self-enrichment and power. Opposed to them are political parties that either openly or tacitly honour God and seek to implement biblical values into society.

There may be obtuse arguments for Africanisation versus Westernisation, but when you strip away the rhetoric and protestations it all comes down to opposition to the God of the bible and his values. Note again the words of Moses, “Now choose life, so that you and your children may live and that you may love the Lord your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him”. Note too the fact that the choice we all must make affects not only ourselves but our children’s livelihood and wellbeing, both physical and spiritual.

  • 1 Timothy 2:1-4 “I urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone – for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth”.

Paul was not instructing that the Jesus followers he was writing to should only pray for Christian national leaders. At that time there were no Christian national leaders because the governments of the day were firmly in the grasp of pagans. He presented the idea that we Christians should pray for all those in authority. Why? So that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. And if we are to pray and intercede then it surely follows that we should act accordingly.

Our action at this time is to vote for what we believe pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.

What  Jesus and the Disciples Said

I wrote about the 2024 election in August 2023 and included a brief analysis of what Jesus and his disciples said concerning the interface between a life of faith and political and economic realities. Here is what I wrote:

It is true that Jesus did not seem to concern himself with the politics of his day, but he did have something to say that points us in the right direction today. Peter and Paul then expanded on this in their letters.

Luke 20: 20-26 (Matthew 22 and Mark 12) records one of the best-known sayings of the Lord Jesus. The Pharisees tried to trap him by asking if it was right to pay taxes to Caesar. Jesus asked for a Roman coin that bore Caesar’s image and said, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s”. The Creator made man in his own image, and so Jesus was saying that humans should give themselves to God whose image we bare. However, Caesar’s image was on the coin so they should give that to him. A brilliant response indeed, but we should not focus on his allusion to the image of God to the extent that we miss the implication that Jesus was endorsing the Roman governmental right to what it was due.

Paul wrote that ‘Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities…’ (Romans 13:1). He then explained why and added, ‘Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honour, then honour’. (Romans 13:7). He also wrote to Titus instructing him to, ‘Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready to do whatever is good.’ (Titus 3:1).

Peter’s teaching on the subject is probably the most succinct of all: ‘Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right. For it is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men. Live as free men, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as servants of God. Show proper respect to everyone: Love the brotherhood of believers, fear God, honour the king’. (1 Peter 2:13-17)

The Lord Jesus, Paul, and Peter were positively interacting with the subject of politics and by so doing were giving us direction as we too interact with the politics of our nation today.

Two Final Injunctions

My concluding plea in the August 2023 article was that everyone legally able to vote should register to vote and actively support members of the MPC. However, the time has long run out to register. Now, all that remains is for each of us to vote according to conviction and a sense of the leading of the Holy Spirit.

In previous elections, many people, although registered, did not vote. The two main excuses were, “The ruling party are so dominant that my vote won’t matter”, or, “I am making a statement of objection by not voting”. Neither of these reasons has any merit whatsoever. These elections are going to be close … very close. Your vote will matter and the statement you will make by voting is “I care about the future of my nation, my children, and the generations to come.”

Yet, one other thing is vital at this time and that is to PRAY. Let me return to a text I cited earlier in this article, 1 Timothy 2:1-4 ‘I urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone – for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth’. So the call is to pray and to vote.

There is a reason why God instructs us to pray for those in authority in the context of the crucial election before us and it is this: We cannot fully conceive what God can do in a day. Despite the polls and despite the politicking, rhetoric, and even cheap tricks, it is what happens on the 29th of May 2024 that matters. On that day the Lord can change the nation and express his influence through millions of people. If we pray for this and hope for this, then when it happens, only one name will be raised up in thanks and adoration. That name will not be your name, my name, or any politician’s name; that name will be … JESUS!

The two things we can all do to influence the destiny of our nation is to pray and vote … SO PLEASE PRAY and PLEASE VOTE according to your prayers.

Choose This Day Read More »

The Lost Books

The Hidden Books

The Lost Books

There is a saying that comes up from time to time that I find intriguing: ‘The instruments of a man’s sin are the instruments of his punishment’. The idea is that the bad things we do tend to be done to us; a more specific version of, “all who draw the sword will die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52). I have even heard it expressed something like, “God uses the evil a man does to punish him”.

This is an interesting idea because it explains how God, who is love, can also be the God of justice, without compromising his essential nature.

Source

Of course, I  wanted to know if this idea, and the saying that expresses it, is found in the scriptures. If it doesn’t then we cannot take it as more than just a good thought. So, I set about tracking it down and found it in the Wisdom of Solomon (Chapter 11, verse 16). “Say what now? Solomon I know, but there is no book by that name in the bible!” This is because the Wisdom of Solomon is one of the books in a collection of writings called the Apocrypha.

The Apocrypha

Approximately four hundred years before Jesus was born into the world, several Jewish wise men/philosophers/theologians wrote several books that were later grouped into a collection that became known as the Apocrypha, or Hidden Books.

In the 3rd century BC the Jewish sacred writings we know as the Old Testament were translated into Greek, the most widely used language in the parts of the world inhabited by Jewish people. This version of the scriptures, known as the Septuagint contained at least seven of the books of the Apocrypha. In 1546 the Roman Catholic Church included ten books of the Apocrypha and inserted them between the Old and New Testaments, thus accepting them as divinely inspired. The Reformation started in 1517 and the Protestant churches birthed by this movement rejected the books of the Apocrypha and did not include them in their versions of the bible.

This is all quite interesting, but what interests me more is that some of the New Testament authors cited or alluded to texts from the Apocrypha.

The Influence of the Apocrypha on the New Testament

Here are some examples of traces of the Apocrypha in the New Testament:

  • Jude 6 reflects the influence of 1 Enoch and Jude 14 mentions Enoch prophesying in a way that most likely comes from 1 Enoch 1:9.
  • 1 Peter 3:19 may have its source in 1 Enoch 14 and 15.
  • Hebrews 11:34-35 reflects a familiarity with 2 Maccabees 6:18 – 7:42.
  • 2 Timothy 3:8-9 refers to Jannes and Jambres’ opposition to Moses, which is not in the Old Testament but is in The Assumption of Moses.
  • Ephesians 6:13-17 echoes The Wisdom of Solomon 5:18-20

This is not surprising because the version of the Old Testament used by the Apostles was the Septuagint. However, those references do not mean that the writings referenced are inspired; it just means that the writers were familiar with them and thought it appropriate to include snippets from them. I am comfortable with this, but those who believe that God more or less dictated the bible word for word to his human scribes would have a real problem here. If theologians believed that the entire bible was ‘dictated’ then they would have to accept several doctrines not taught in the Protestant bible. For instance, the book of Sirach teaches that good works are an essential qualification for salvation. Baruch teaches we can pray for the dead and Maccabees advocates the intercessory role of Saints. The Wisdom of Solomon teaches that human souls exist before they relocate into humans at birth.

The New Testament gives evidence that the Jews of Jesus’ day believed these teachings. For instance, Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 15:29 ‘Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead?’ The people in that church were going beyond just praying for the dead, they were being baptised as proxies for dead family members and friends. Even the disciples were influenced by the doctrine of the pre-existence of the soul because they asked Jesus concerning a man who was blind from birth, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”  (John 9:1-2)

How we should regard the Apocrypha

Considering what I have written above, I think that we shouldn’t discount the Apocrypha, but we should not consider it as divinely inspired. It is useful in that it provides background material and, in some cases, helps us to understand some of the things we find in the bible.

It appears that the Fathers of the early church adopted this approach. Teachers such as Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Clement of Alexandria cited some of the apocryphal writings as scripture. Origen held that the quotation in 1 Corinthians 2:9 that ‘things which eye has not seen or ear heard’ was from the Apocalypse of Elijah. Ambrose, Jerome, Philip of Side, the venerable Bede, and Theophylactus all mention a work called the Gospel of the Twelve.

OK, now back to the saying that caused me to delve into these things.

What the Bible Reveals

The question, for me at least, is does the bible contain something like ‘The instruments of a man’s sin are the instruments of his punishment’?

  • Proverbs 22:8 states that ‘He who sows wickedness reaps trouble…’, but this does not mean quite the same thing. It simply declares that, in general terms, wicked acts result in some form of trouble.
  • Job 4:8 makes the equally general observation that, ‘those who plough evil and those who sow trouble reap it’.
  • Paul writes that ‘a man reaps what he sows’ (Galatians 6:7), but he then elaborates in a general, more than a specific, way’.
  • Hosea 8:7, however, gets us to a very similar expression to the one from the Apocrypha when it states that ‘They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind’. Like for like but to a greater and more destructive extent.
What Did Jesus Say

I have a friend who routinely challenges dodgy church practices with the question, “So where do you find that in the bible?” When it comes to doctrine, my habitual question is, “What did Jesus teach or model concerning this?” The Lord Jesus is our plumb line for finding the straight line through teachings. Therefore, as always, I turn now to what Jesus taught.

Now, I normally start with what Jesus said and did and then work out from there, but I have structured this article as a discovery, so, although I referenced him right upfront, I will conclude with what the Lord said. He said, “With the measure you use, it will be measured to you”. (Mark 4:24) So, Jesus set out the principle, but his emphasis was on the degree and proportionality of a person’s acts.

I guess I will have to be satisfied that Hosea set it out, more or less, as the Wisdom of Solomon later articulated it and that the Lord Jesus confirmed it in general terms. The book in the Apocrypha does not add a new truth, but it does help us to understand more fully what Hosea and Jesus taught.

So What?

All left now for us to ponder on is what the saying means to us and how it affects our lives.

The nub of it is that what we put out in life comes back to us in one way or another and to much the same extent. Sow faith, hope, and love and reap back positive and life-giving input. Sow doubt, fear, and hopelessness and the chances are that the harvest will be of the same nature only much worse.

Something that has stuck with me from a very early age is my mother quoting her father who was fond of giving Ecclesiastes 1:1 an amusing twist when he stated “cast your bread upon the waters and it will come back to you as a ham sandwich”. Yes indeed, and I do so enjoy a ham sandwich!

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Appendix:  A Short Summary of Apocryphal Books

For those interested in knowing more, here is a brief description of what the various ‘Hidden Books’ are about (with acknowledgement to an Artificial intelligence programme I use quite often):

The books recognised by the Roman Catholic Church are:

  1. Tobit: Tobit is a narrative about a righteous Israelite named Tobit who experiences various trials but is ultimately rewarded for his faithfulness to God. It includes themes of obedience, charity, and divine providence.
  2. Judith: Judith tells the story of a courageous Jewish widow named Judith who saves her people from the Assyrian general Holofernes by using her beauty and wit to deceive him and then assassinate him.
  3. Wisdom of Solomon: This book emphasises the importance of wisdom and righteousness, contrasting them with folly and wickedness. It also discusses the immortality of the soul and the rewards of righteousness.
  4. Sirach (Ecclesiasticus): Sirach is a collection of wise sayings and teachings attributed to Jesus Ben Sirach.  It covers a wide range of topics, including wisdom, virtue, friendship, family life, and social conduct.
  5. Baruch: Attributed to Baruch, the scribe of the prophet Jeremiah. It contains prayers, confessions, and reflections on the exile of the Jewish people and their hope for restoration.
  6. Letter of Jeremiah: This short letter warns against idolatry and emphasises the powerlessness of idols, contrasting them with the one true God.
  7. Additions to Daniel: These additions include the Prayer of Azariah and the Song of the Three Jews, as well as the story of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon, which are not found in the Hebrew version of Daniel.
  8. Additions to Esther: These additions include prayers and reflections not found in the Hebrew version of Esther, emphasizing God’s providence in the salvation of the Jewish people.
  9. 1 Maccabees: 1 Maccabees is a historical account of the Maccabean revolt against the Seleucid Empire, focusing on the leadership of Judas Maccabeus and the rededication of the Temple in Jerusalem.
  10. 2 Maccabees: 2 Maccabees provides a parallel account of the events in 1 Maccabees, highlighting the martyrdom of certain Jewish leaders and emphasizing the importance of prayer for the dead.

The following are included in some bible translations but are not accepted as canonical by the Roman Catholic church:

  • 1 Esdras: Also known as the Greek Ezra, 1 Esdras is an ancient text that includes stories and events parallel to those found in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah in the Old Testament. It includes the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem, the dispute over the king’s decree regarding the temple construction, and the prayer of Ezra for God’s mercy.
  • 2 Esdras (4 Ezra): 2 Esdras is a Jewish apocalyptic work that deals with themes of divine justice, theodicy, and the end times. It contains visions and dialogues between the prophet Ezra and an angel, exploring questions about the suffering of the righteous, the fate of the wicked, and the nature of God’s judgment.
  • Letter of Jeremiah: The Letter of Jeremiah is a short text included as Chapter 6 of the Book of Baruch in the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament. It is addressed to the exiled Jews in Babylon and warns against the worship of idols,  emphasising the folly of idolatry and the superiority of the one true God.
  • The Book of 1 Enoch is an ancient Jewish text attributed to Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah. It is a collection of several separate works, most of which are apocalyptic in nature. The oldest part, the “Apocalypse of Weeks,” was written around the Maccabean uprising of 167 BC. The book includes various themes such as messianism, celibacy, and the fate of the soul after death, and it reflects a blend of Iranian, Greek, Chaldean, and Egyptian elements.
  •  The Assumption of Moses, also known as the Testament of Moses, is a 1st-century Jewish apocryphal work that contains prophecies Moses revealed to Joshua before passing on leadership. It is characterised as Moses’ final speech and includes a prophecy of the future relating to Israel. The text is thought to have been originally written in Hebrew or another Semitic language and later translated to Greek. However, only a 6th-century Latin translation survives, and it is incomplete.

 

The Hidden Books Read More »

About Me

My name is Christopher Peppler and I was born in Cape Town, South Africa in 1947. While working in the financial sector I achieved a number of business qualifications from the Institute of Bankers, Damelin Management School, and The University of the Witwatersrand Business School. After over 20 years as a banker, I followed God’s calling and joined the ministry full time. After becoming a pastor of what is now a quite considerable church, I  earned an undergraduate theological qualification from the Baptist Theological College of Southern Africa and post-graduate degrees from two United States institutions. I was also awarded the Doctor of Theology in Systematic Theology from the University of Zululand in 2000.

Four years before that I established the South African Theological Seminary (SATS), which today is represented in over 70 countries and has more than 2 500 active students enrolled with it. I presently play an role supervising Masters and Doctoral students.

I am a passionate champion of the Christocentric or Christ-centred Principle, an approach to biblical interpretation and theological construction that emphasises the centrality of Jesus

I have been happily married to Patricia since the age of 20, have two children, Lance and Karen, a daughter-in-law Tracey, and granddaughters Jessica and Kirsten. I have now retired from both church and seminary leadership and devote my time to writing, discipling, and the classical guitar.

If you would like to read my testimony to Jesus then click HERE.